Weaknesses in centralized and decentralized internet voting protocols
Main Article Content
Abstract
The present document analyzes the weaknesses of the protocols regarding internet voting systems, either centralized or decentralized one, as a technology used for many countries around the world that may significantly increase the numbers of electors, offers transparency, delivery of results and reduces the costs of the whole electoral process, allowing an auditable way either for the citizen and public entities.
The use of Remote Electronic Voting Systems (REV), had been opening a new way for e-government services, giving the community other tools for electoral purposes, and at the same time had create a long list of securities challenges which have allowed the development of new I-voting systems, among communities that focus on the research of different ways to minimize the risks of this process.
Downloads
Article Details
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Authors who publish in the INNOVA Research Journal keeps copyright and guarantee the journal the right to be the first publication of the work under the Creative Commons License, Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). They can be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and publicly exhibited, provided that: a) the authorship and original source of their publication (magazine, publisher, URL and DOI of the work) is cited; b) are not used for commercial purposes; c) the existence and specifications of this license of use are mentioned.
References
Ammar Alkassar, M. V. (2007). www.download.springer.com. Obtenido de http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-77493-8_1
Andrew Barnes, C. B. (s.f.). Digital Voting with the use of Blockchain Technology. Team Plymouth Pioneers “ Plymouth University.
Arvind Narayanan, J. B. (02 de 2016). Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency Technologies. Obtenido de https://d28rh4a8wq0iu5.cloudfront.net/bitcointech/readings/princeton_bitcoin_book.pdf?a=1
Bitcoinwiki. (s.f.). Bitcoinwiki. Obtenido de https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Weaknesses
Blockgeeks. (s.f.). Obtenido de http://blockgeeks.com/guides/what-is-blockchain-technology
Commission, U. E. (2016). The electoral Commission. Obtenido de http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/find-information-by-subject/elections-and-referendums/upcoming-elections-and-referendums/eu-referendum/electorate-and-count-information
Deloitte. (s.f.). Deloitte. Obtenido de Blockchain Technology: 9 Benefits and 7 Chalenges:
Dirección de Régimen JurÃdico, S. y. (03 de 05 de 2016). http://www.euskadi.eus. Obtenido de http://www.euskadi.eus/botoelek/otros_paises/ve_mundo_impl_c.htm
Drew Springall, T. F. (s.f.). Security Analysis of the Estonian Internet
Voting System. Obtenido de https://jhalderm.com:
https://jhalderm.com/pub/papers/ivoting-ccs14.pdf
Followmyvote. (s.f.). Online Voting Technology. Obtenido de https://followmyvote.com/online-voting-technology/blockchain-technology/
Francesca Caiazzo. (14 de 12 de 2016). The Benefits and Risks of Block-Chain Voting. Obtenido de http://www.cs.tufts.edu: http://www.cs.tufts.edu/comp/116/archive/fall2016/fcaiazzo.pdf
Gritzalis, D. A. (s.f.). http://www.instore.gr. Obtenido de http://www.instore.gr/evote/evote_end/htm/3public/doc3/public/aegean/paper7.pdf
Gritzalis, P. D. (septiembre de 2002). Secure Electronic Voting System. Obtenido de https://www.terena.org/activities/tf-csirt/meeting7/gritzalis-electronic-voting.pdf
https://followmyvote.com/. (s.f.). https://followmyvote.com/ . Obtenido de https://followmyvote.com/
Inteco. (s.f.). BITCOIN Una moneda criptografica. Obtenido de Instituto Nacional de Tecnologias de la Comunicación: https://www.certsi.es/sites/default/files/contenidos/estudios/doc/int_bitcoin.pdf
Lauer, T. W. (2004). The Risk of E-voting. Electronic Journal of e-government Volumen 2 Issue 3.
Melanie Volkamer, D. H. (s.f.). From Legal Principles to an Internet Voting System. German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence GmbH .
Mundo, B. (s.f.). bbc.com. Obtenido de http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-america-latina-37539590
OEA, S. d. (08 de 2014). “TECNOLOGÃAS APLICADAS AL CICLO ELECTORA. Obtenido de http://www.oas.org/en/: https://www.oas.org/es/sap/docs/deco/Tecnologias_s.pdf
Paper, P. (Diciembre de 2011). Introducing Electronic Voting - Esential Considerations. Obtenido de International Idea: http://www.eods.eu/library/IDEA.Introducing-Electronic-Voting-Essential-Considerations.pdf
Pomares, J. P. (August de 2016). www.springer.com. Obtenido de http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12243-016-0525-8
Project, E.-V. (s.f.). The Future of Voting. Obtenido de https://www.usvotefoundation.org/E2E-VIV
Results, E. R. (2016). Electoral Commission. Obtenido de http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/find-information-by-subject/elections-and-referendums/past-elections-and-referendums/eu-referendum/electorate-and-count-information
Scott Wolchok, E. W. (2012). Attacking the Washington, D.C. Internet
Voting System. Obtenido de https://jhalderm.com: https://jhalderm.com/pub/papers/dcvoting-fc12.pdf
Scott Wolchok, E. W. (02 de 2012). Attacking The Washington, D.C.
Internet Voting System. Obtenido de https://jhalderm.com/pub/papers/dcvoting-fc12.pdf
Smartmatic. (s.f.). Estonia Election. Obtenido de Smartmatic.com: http://www.smartmatic.com/uploads/tx_news/CS_Estonia_elections_2014_2015.pdf
Smartmatic. (s.f.). Estonia Elections 2014 - 2015: Technology Case Studie . Obtenido de Smartmatic.com: http://www.smartmatic.com/case-studies/article/estonian-elections-2004-2015-technology/
Technologies, E. V. (s.f.). Electronic Votes Pros and Contra. Obtenido de http://www.bravenewballot.org/
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, I. (2002). Electronic Voting Protocols and Schemes. Obtenido de http://www.cs.huji.ac.il/~ns/Voting2.pdf
Volkamer, A. A. (2007). springer.com. Obtenido de https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-540-77493-8
Wikipedia. (s.f.). Wikipedia. Obtenido de https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blockchain_(database)
Wolchok S, W. E. (2012). Attacking the Washington, D.C. Internet Voting System. Obtenido de https://paperpile.com/c/XmUfWx/e6X3