Social responsibility: Compliance with the ISO 26000 guidelines against the legal requirements of health and safety at work
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research is a descriptive non-experimental cross-sectional study, whose purpose is to demonstrate compliance with Social Responsibility and occupational risk prevention through the guidelines of the ISO 26000 Guide to identify the implementation standards in Ecuadorian companies. The survey was used as a data collection instrument in the months of March and April 2021, with the participation of 388 professionals and, being a study of qualitative variables, the frequencies and percentages of compliance with the guidelines of numeral 6.4.6.6 Subject 4 on labor practices: occupational health and safety of the ISO 26000 Guide to Social Responsibility were analyzed. The level of compliance with the variables analyzed in document management and universal good practices such as the provision of personal and collective protection equipment and occupational examinations are acceptable. The management in equity and protection of vulnerable people, the generation of new policies that guarantee the non-prosecution of employees for evidencing unsafe actions and conditions in their workplaces, and the lack of commitment in the non-participation and decision making of the joint bodies are less frequently complied with. Weaknesses are observed in the achievement of the guidelines issued by the Social Responsibility Guide in the context of commitment, protection and equity of all stakeholders of the organizations. The commitment to comprehensive management of occupational risks should be reformulated, as it is one of the main aspects of corporate social responsibility.
Downloads
Article Details
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Authors who publish in the INNOVA Research Journal keeps copyright and guarantee the journal the right to be the first publication of the work under the Creative Commons License, Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). They can be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and publicly exhibited, provided that: a) the authorship and original source of their publication (magazine, publisher, URL and DOI of the work) is cited; b) are not used for commercial purposes; c) the existence and specifications of this license of use are mentioned.
References
Castka, P., & Balzarova, M. A. (2008). ISO 26000 and supply chains-On the diffusion of the social responsibility standard. International Journal of Production Economics, 111(2), 274–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.10.017
Céspedes Socarrás, G. M., y Martínez Cumbrera, J. M. (2016). Un análisis de la seguridad y salud en el trabajo en el sistema empresarial cubano. In Revista Latinoamericana de Derecho Social 22(22), 3–61. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rlds.2016.03.001
Chandan, H. C., & Das, R. (2017). Evolution of Responsible and Sustainable Corporate Identity for Chinese Firms. In The China Business Model: Originality and Limits. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100750-1.00004-8
Comunidad Andina. (2004). Instrumento Andino de Seguridad y Salud en el Trabajo. Instrumento Andino de Seguridad y Salud En El Trabajo, 13.
Comunidad Andina. (2005). Resolución 957. Reglamento del Instrumento Andino. 6.
Constitución República del Ecuador. (2008). Derechos del buen vivir. Constitución Del Ecuador, 132.
Creixans-Tenas, J., Coenders, G., & Arimany-Serrat, N. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and financial profile of Spanish private hospitals. Heliyon, 5(10), e02623. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2019.E02623
Escamilla Solano, S., Plaza Casado, P., & Flores Ureba, S. (2016). Analysis of the disclosure of information on corporate social responsibility in urban public transport companies in Spain. Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review, 19(2), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsar.2015.05.002
Gallardo-Vázquez, D., Sánchez-Hernández, M. I., & Corchuelo-Martínez-Azúa, M. B. (2013). Validation of a measurement scale for the relationship between the orientation to corporate social responsibility and other business strategic variables. Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review, 16(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1138-4891(13)70002-5
Hernando, J., y Velandia, M. (2013). De la salud ocupacional a la gestión de la seguridad y salud en el trabajo : más que semántica , una transformación del sistema general de riesgos laborales. 21–32.
Instituto Ecuatoriano de Seguridad Social. (2016). Reglamento del seguro general de riesgos del trabajo (Resolución C.D. 513). Iess, 53(9), 1689–1699. https://www.iess.gob.ec/documents/10162/33703/C.D.+513
Jirka, G. P., & Thompson, W. (2009). Personal protective equipment. The A3 Workbook: Unlock Your Problem-Solving Mind, 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420071825-29
Larrosa Moles, M., & Martínez-Jarreta, B. (2020). Occupational cancer: A hidden reality and an awaiting challenge. Medicina Clinica, 154(1), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2019.08.005
Liu, R., Liu, Z., Liu, H. C., & Shi, H. (2021). An improved alternative queuing method for occupational health and safety risk assessment and its application to construction excavation. Automation in Construction, 126, 103672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103672
López Gobernado, M., Villalba Gil, D., & Hernández Bartolomé, J. (2018). Health and safety management system to improve the self-protection plans in intensive care units. Medicina Intensiva, 42(7), 457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medin.2018.02.010
López Salazar, A., Ojeda Hidalgo, J. F., & Ríos Manríquez, M. (2017). The corporate social responsibility from the perception of human capital. A case study. Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review, 20(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsar.2016.01.001
Martinez Ferrero, J., Prado Lorenzo, J. M., & Fernandez-Fernandez, J. M. (2013). Corporate social responsibility vs. accounting ethics. Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review, 16(1), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1138-4891(13)70004-9
Martínez, M., y Yandún, E. D. (2017). Seguridad y Salud Ocupacional en Ecuador: Contribución Normativa a la Responsabilidad Social Organizacional. INNOVA Research Journal, 2(3), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.33890/innova.v2.n3.2017.135
Ministerio del Trabajo. (2016). Código del Trabajo. Registro Oficial, 138, 1–159. www.lexis.com.ec
Ministerio del Trabajo. (2017). Instructivo para el cumplimiento de las obligaciones de empleadores. Acuerdo Ministerial 135, 1–12. www.lexis.com.ec
Ministerio del Trabajo. (2020). ACUERDO-MINISTERIAL-Nro.-MDT-2020-001.pdf.
Ministerio del Trabajo - Ecuador. (n.d.). Decreto ejecutivo 2393 Reglamento de seguridad y salud de los trabajadores y mejoramiento del medio ambiente de trabajo.
Moreno, G., y Villena, R. (2020). Vacunas en salud laboral… una oportunidad para prevenir e invertir en salud. Revista Médica Clínica Las Condes, 31(3), 287–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmclc.2020.05.001
Olanipekun, A. O., Omotayo, T., & Saka, N. (2021). Review of the Use of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Tools. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SPC.2020.11.012
Pishvaee, M. S., Mohseni, S., & Bairamzadeh, S. (2021). Sustainability concepts in biofuel supply chain. Biomass to Biofuel Supply Chain Design and Planning Under Uncertainty, 95–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820640-9.00005-2
Pulido, M. P. (2018). ISO 26000:2010 Guidance on Social Responsibility. In Ethics Management in Libraries and Other Information Services. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-101894-1.00005-7
Rajendran, S., Giridhar, S., Chaudhari, S., & Gupta, P. K. (2021). Technological advancements in occupational health and safety. Measurement: Sensors, 15, 100045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2021.100045
Romeral Hernández, J. (2012). Gestión de la seguridad y salud laboral, y mejora de las condiciones de trabajo. El modelo español. In Boletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado, nueva serie, año XLV, núm. 135, septiembre-diciembre de 2012, pp. 1325-1339.Biblioteca Jurídica Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas de la UNAM (Issue siglo I, pp. 1325–1339).
Romero Saldaña, M., Moreno Pimentel, A. G., & Santos Posada, A. (2019). Occupational Health Nursing: Competence and experience to achieve the safety, health and well-being of the working population. Enfermeria Clinica, 29(6), 376–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2019.09.012
Shanmugasundar, G., Sri Sabarinath, S., Ramesh Babu, K., & Srividhya, M. (2021). Analysis of occupational health and safety measures of employee in material manufacturing industry using statistical methods. Materials Today: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.296
Sharma, R., & Mishra, D. K. (2021). An analysis of thematic structure of research trends in occupational health and safety concerning safety culture and environmental management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 125346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125346
Sierra-García, L., García-Benau, M. A., & Zorio, A. (2014). Credibility in Latin America of corporate social responsibility reports. RAE Revista de Administracao de Empresas, 54(1), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020140104
Suasnavas, P., Andrade, A., Granda, K., Dávalos, H., Cárdenas, H., y Gómez, A. (2019). Responsabilidad social y gestión de la seguridad y salud en el trabajo: panorama actual de las empresas ecuatorianas. Revista ESPACIOS, 40(04), 18. http://es.revistaespacios.com/a19v40n04/19400418.html
Yandún, E., Freire, L., Flores, J. C., y Gualotuña, C. A. V. (2017). Responsabilidad social corporativa y su relación con la seguridad y salud ocupacional en el Ecuador. RECIMUNDO: Revista Científica de la Investigación y el Conocimiento, 1(5), 766-798.